I organize based on the following work breakdown structure:
Corporate / Group Marketing:
- Strategy
- Positioning
- Branding
- Website [including SEO]
- Metrics & Analytics
- Tools
- Public Relations
- Analyst Relations
- Online Exposure / Digital Outreach [this is a new responsibility and includes coordinating online feedback, blogging, message boards postings, viral exposure, directories etc.]
- Lead Generation Campaigns
- Advertising (online & offline)
- Marketing Campaigns (nurturing and upsell)
- Sales Team Support
- Events
- Product Positioning
- Collateral Development [brochures, cutsheets, whitepapers, case studies, etc.]
- Sales Tools Development [ROI calculators, positioning sheets, presentations, etc.]
- Competitive Monitoring & G2
- Product Roadmap
- Business Case Development
- Requirements Gathering
- Solution Validation
- Sales Expertise
So, I started out this posting to validate if my tested Marketing Structure has held-up, and it has. There are a couple of newer responsibilities in PR (online based), and Field Marketing has additional mediums (e.g. SEM) that are evolving very quickly, but all-in-all the structure works. Also, depending on the company size, these activities and responsibilities can either be assigned to individuals, or in larger organizations, spread across different teams. Does this structure apply to all organizations and industries? Nope -one size does not fit all- but it does work well for on-premise Software companies, SaaS providers and online information based services. I am sure that at some point I will evolve and change the structure, just not yet.
No comments:
Post a Comment